翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Political myth
・ Political naturalism
・ Political nihilism
・ Political offence exception
・ Political offences in China
・ Political officer
・ Political officer (British Empire)
・ Political opportunism
・ Political opportunity
・ Political Order in Changing Societies
・ Political organisation of Hispania
・ Political organization
・ Political organizations and Armed forces in Vietnam
・ Political parallelism
・ Political particularism
Political Parties (book)
・ Political Parties and Elections Act 2009
・ Political parties in Belgium
・ Political parties in Flanders
・ Political parties in Iran
・ Political parties in Russia
・ Political parties in Swaziland
・ Political parties in the United States
・ Political parties in Ukraine
・ Political parties in Yemen
・ Political parties of minorities
・ Political parties of the Empire of Japan
・ Political parties of the Spanish Civil War
・ Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000
・ Political party


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Political Parties (book) : ウィキペディア英語版
Political Parties (book)

thumb
''Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy'' ((ドイツ語:Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie; Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens)) is a book by sociologist Robert Michels, published in 1911 and first introducing the concept of iron law of oligarchy. It is considered one of the classics of social sciences, in particular sociology and political science.〔〔 It was translated to Italian as ''Sociologia del partito politico nella democrazia moderna: studi sulle tendenze oligarchiche degli aggregati politici'' by Alfredo Polledro in 1912, and then translated from the Italian to English by Eden Paul and Cedar Paul for Hearst's International Library Co. in 1915.
This work analyzes the power structures of organizations such as political parties and trade unions. Michels's main argument is that all organizations, even those in theory most egalitarian and most committed to democracy - like socialist political parties - are in fact oligarchical, and dominated by a small group of leadership. The book also provides a first systematic analysis of how a radical political party loses its radical goals under the dynamics of electoral participation. The origins of moderation theory can be found in this analysis.
==Synopsis==
Michels put forward a thesis about incompatibility of democracy and large-scale social organizations. He observed that contrary to democratic and egalitarian principles, both society in general, and specific organizations in particular are dominated by the leadership - the oligarchy.〔 This, according to Michels, was not because of any particular weakness of a particular society or organization in question, but a characteristic of any and all complex social systems.〔 Such social systems have to be organized along the bureaucratic principles, and bureaucracies inevitably develop oligarchies. Michels concluded that in any complex organization, and such dominate the modern world, it is impossible to escape domination of oligarchy - a conclusion which became known as the iron law of oligarchy.〔
The iron law of oligarchy is based on the following logic. First, any large scale organization will necessitate the development of bureaucracy for efficient administration.〔 Such leaders will amass resources (superior knowledge control over the formal means of communication with the membership, and the skill in the art of politics) given them power at the expense of rank and file members.〔
Second, Michels expressed doubts about whether the rank and file possess the skills necessary to compete with the leaders, a concept he phrased as the "incompetence of the masses". In order to prevent the development of an oligarchy, the regular members must be involved in various activities of the organizations; however, reality of time constrains due to work, family and leisure will reduce the amount of time that most such members are willing to dedicate to active involvement in organizational activities and politics. This is compounded by the rank and file lack of education, and corresponding sophistication of the leadership.〔
In his case study of his contemporary socialist parties, primarily the German Social Democratic Party. It was radical organization in his time, fighting for novel concepts such as adult suffrage, free speech, and popular participation in the government.〔 Michels described how their political program was overshadowed by the expansion of the organization favored by the administrative bureaucracy.〔〔 This, Michels observed, can be explained thus" "it is far from obvious that the interests of the masses which have combined to form the party will coincide with the interests of the bureaucracy in which the party becomes personified."〔 Michels noted that if an organization dedicated to such principles failed to realize its democratic ideals in is own governance, it is unlikely that other organizations, even less concerned with such lofty goals, would be able to function as democracies.〔

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Political Parties (book)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.